<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] [Motion on users and GNSO]
- To: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] [Motion on users and GNSO]
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:42:33 -0500
- List-id: council@gnso.icann.org
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have a question. Assuming the answer regarding the clause below is
yes, where/how do you envisage quickly finding these user
representatives. Since their task will be to work with ALAC and
At-Large to develop a recommendation to be "forwarded to the NCUC for
their consideration", the implication is that they themselves are not
from NCUC.
Alan
At 22/01/2009 08:23 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
My apologies for being several hours late, but I would like to make
the motion that is attached and copied below for consideration at
our 29 Jan meeting. A second is welcome as are friendly amendments.
.....
* Determine whether the ALAC and At-Large community would like
the GNSO to identify some noncommercial user representatives,
especially individual users, who would be willing to work with the
ALAC and At-Large community to develop a recommendation regarding
the Board's request that could be forwarded to the NCUC for their
consideration in developing a stakeholder group charter and to the
Board for action on GNSO improvement recommendations.
......
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|