ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Ad promotion of Call for Papers on new gTLDs

  • To: "'GNSO Council'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Ad promotion of Call for Papers on new gTLDs
  • From: Cary Karp <ck@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:43:50 +0100 (CET)
  • Cc: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Olof Nordling'" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <BAY104-DAV14EE3A10A6BCF7AEF74BC5D3250@phx.gbl>
  • References: <BAY104-DAV14EE3A10A6BCF7AEF74BC5D3250@phx.gbl>
  • Reply-to: Cary Karp <ck@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I don't think we ever agreed that someone would read a paper, similar to an academic conference. We were clear that we would provide opportunities for summary presentations/discussions of contributions on some basis. 

The call as posted on the ICANN site says:

"Received papers will be considered for oral presentations to the GNSO Council during February 2006, via scheduled conference calls with the GNSO Council."

If the oral presentations are only to be summary descriptions of the papers and nothing is said about any other mode of publication, why would anyone undertake the time and effort of preparing a "substantive paper"?

Any chance of the Council seeing the ad copy before we commit to it?

/Cary

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>